|
Homeless Youth
Rally
Please join us to show the leaders of Oregon how much we
need support for the local services to runaway and homeless youth on Monday,
May 14!
Come and participate in the Homeless Youth Rally on
Monday, from 11:30 to 1:00 on the Capitol steps. You can also
join the group before the rally in Room 50 from 9:00 to 11:00 for
speakers, networking, and to receive information. Refreshments will
be provided. We hope you can attend! Link here for more information
about the day's activities.
Funding for helping this population has been proposed in the
Oregon Commission on Children and Families Budget, SB 5504.
Public testimony on SB 5504 at the Human Services
Subcommittee of Ways and Means will be taken on Tuesday, May 15 at 1:00
p.m. in Hearing Room F.
To learn more about homeless youth, see the League's
excellent report, Oregon's Homeless Youth.
|
|
Follow Key Bills
The League's bill matrix,
which lists key bills that we are following this session, is updated
weekly. The matrix includes legislative action taken, League action
taken, and links to our testimony.
|
Head Start Cuts
Crime in Oregon
On May 1, the Public Safety Subcommittee heard about Head Start from an
organization called Fight Crime: Invest in Kids Oregon. Police,
sheriffs, prosecutors, and crime victims support this organization.
Walt Beglau, Marion County District Attorney, and Gary Will, Chief of
Police in Turner, testified for the 137 Oregon members. Two reports
were quoted crediting Head Start for preventing as many as 500 kids from
becoming criminals, and saving $500 million per year, of which $300
million is in reduced government expenses and increased tax revenue.
The reports are Head Start Cuts Crime in Oregon and Investing in Oregon Pre-Kindergarten Head Start Saves
Money.
Karen Nibler, Social Policy Coordinator
|
|
LWVOR Action Committee
|
|
Chair:
Norman Turrill
Vice Chair:
Marge Easley
Citizen Access Coordinator:
Paula Krane
Governance Coordinator:
Kappy Eaton
Natural Resources Coordinator:
Liz Frenkel
Social Policy Coordinator:
Karen Nibler
Legislative Coordinator:
Brena Lopez
Portfolio members and committee representatives:
Bob Adams
Debbie Aiona
Jane Baumgarten
Diana Bodtker
Anna Braun
Barbara Browning
Sarah Chaplen
Anita Francis
Barbara Fredericks
Norma Jean Germond
Gail Holmes
Peggy Lynch
Ellen Maddex
Janet Markee
Erin Miller
Margaret Noel
Barbara Ross
Nancy Stevens
Pam Vavra
Intern:
Terra Ashford
Legislative Report Editor:
Rebecca Smith
|
Ethics on Waiting List
We are waiting for SB 10A, which contains substantive ethics elements,
to be discussed in Ways and Means. SB 5522, which addresses Legislative Branch Agencies
and contains support for legislators' offices and staff, was heard in
Ways and Means General Government Subcommittee May 8. We followed this
bill in the Senate Legislative Operations and Reform committee, which had
it referred to them for discussion, because the link between limiting the
personal use of campaign funds is tied to legislators receiving adequate
support for expenses.
Also on the waiting list are the several bills from the Oregon Law
Commission (HB 2594, 2595, 2596, 2597, and 2598) relating to ethics practices. The House
Elections, Ethics and Rules committees held information hearings in
February as well as public hearings in April. No action has been
taken since.
Kappy Eaton, Governance Coordinator
|
|
Donate to
the Legislative Report
Thank you to those of you who have generously contributed funds for the Legislative
Report. The Legislative Report costs money to produce,
yet we don't want to limit who can receive it by charging a subscription
fee. Please support the volunteer Action Team's efforts to share
the happenings at the Capitol with you and others. You can send a
donation, marked "Legislative Report" to the LWV address
below.
Thank you.
|
|
Volunteer
Help is needed to monitor legislative committees and report
back to the Action Committee. If you live close to Salem or have an
Internet connection, you can learn to track
bills and listen to hearings. Help is needed to monitor legislative
committees and report back to the Action Committee. It is a
fascinating experience if you have time to dedicate to the legislative
process. Contact LWVOR to
volunteer.
|
|
|
|
Welcome to issue
13 of the Legislative Report.
Because of our state convention, there will be no
Legislative Report next week. We
will return to our regular schedule the following week.
Link
here to our printer-friendly version.
If you have not yet subscribed, just click on the "Subscribe"
button at left. You can unsubscribe at any time. The email
version of the Legislative Report is free.
Sincerely,
Norman Turrill, Action Chair
Marge Easley, Action Vice Chair
|
|
|
|
How
to Pay for New Schools?
As some parts of Oregon experience exploding growth, the issue of who
pays for new school buildings has risen to the top of some legislators'
agendas this session, including House Majority Leader Dave Hunt of
Clackamas County and Rep. Chuck Burley of Bend. Previous sessions have
called for Systems Development Charges (SDCs) to be assessed against
new housing. Currently, such services as sewer, water, roads and
parks can collect SDCs to help pay for new facilities. Local
governments were, by law, stopped from collecting SDCs for school
facilities.
The League has testified in support of SB 336, which would allow school capacity to be
considered in land use planning decisions. We also supported HB 2525, which would remove the state preemption
and allow local governments to charge SDCs for schools.
Homebuilders have long fought these solutions. On May 10, the
Senate voted to move forward on a new proposal. SB 1036 allows school districts to charge a
construction excise tax on ALL new construction in their
district. This tax would be assessed on commercial and industrial
construction as well as housing. HBA representative Jon Chandler
says "After all, houses are where jobs go to sleep."
Of concern to the League is that this proposal preempts other local
governments from assessing construction excise taxes. Some cities
have already started to use this tool to supplement their shrinking
property taxes due to prior tax initiatives. Wilsonville Mayor
Charlotte Lehan pointed out that, while SB 1036 may assist schools,
"it does this at the expense of local cities and counties by
preempting them from ever using construction excise taxes for any other
purpose."
Most would agree that more financial tools are needed to help both
growing school districts and those which have huge maintenance issues
and low tax bases. HJR 13 has been approved by the House to allow the
state to help with school bonding. If your school district has
special facilities needs, be sure to contact your legislator with your
concerns and possible solutions.
Peggy Lynch, Action Committee Portfolio Member
|
|
Child
Welfare Bills Improve System
Senators Brown and Kruse along with Representatives Krieger and
Schaufler met during last year's legislative interim and formulated a
set of bills to address serious system failures in child welfare
cases. SB 408A, 409A, 410A, 412A and 413A passed the Senate and were reviewed in the
House Judiciary Committee on May 2. Four other bills, SB 411A, 414A, 415A and 282A were sent to Ways and Means from Senate
Judiciary and have not yet been scheduled.
Parental Rights: SB 408A prohibits the Department of Human
Services (DHS) from filing a petition to terminate parental rights
until the court has determined that the permanency plan for the child
should be adoption. This avoids an automatic filing requirement
after a child has been in foster care for 15 of last 22 months.
SB 409A authorizes the court to direct DHS to place a child with a
parent, relative, or another foster care provider if the court determines
that the child's current placement is not in best interest of the
child. Currently, the court orders a dependent child to be placed
in DHS custody and DHS decides the placement. The placements are
reviewed every 6 months by a Citizen Review Board. Any party to
the case can request a court review. This bill adds the options
for placement with parent, relative or another foster care home.
Required Reports: SB 410A authorizes the DHS Director to convene
a sensitive review committee to review the actions of the department as
in a case of death or serious abuse of a child while in care.
This committee may also be convened upon request by the President of
the Senate or Speaker of the House of Representatives. The DHS
Director shall submit a written report of findings and conclusions of
the committee to the President or Speaker who requested the review.
SB 412A requires DHS to notify the child's attorney, Court Appointed
Special Advocate, parents and parents' attorney within 3 days of a
child abuse report while the child is in substitute care.
SB 413A requires DHS to report data on number of children in foster
care, along with the number of placements for each child and placement
with siblings or relatives. This information is currently
gathered but not routinely submitted to the Legislature. This
bill will have no fiscal impact since the information is already
collected.
Funding: The four bills in Ways and Means require additional
funding for DHS Child Welfare. SB 411A appropriates money for Public
Defense Services Commission (PDSC) to improve legal representation of
parents and children in juvenile dependency cases. The
recommendations were to increase per hour payment to defense attorneys
and to increase training in juvenile dependency for those
attorneys. The PDSC Budget SB 5535 was heard in Public Safety Subcommittee on
May 3 and the funding allotted to the agency was insufficient to meet
this recommendation.
Family Relationships: SB 414A requires DHS to make reasonable
efforts to place siblings together. DHS may be required to pay
relatives foster care payments. SB 415A directs DHS to appoint an
ombudsperson for child welfare complaints to be housed in the
Governor's Office.
SB 282A requires DHS to make diligent efforts to preserve family
relationships. The bill requires DHS to record the number of
placements, the schools the child attended, the face-to-face contacts
by the caseworker and visits with the parents or siblings. If the
child is 14 or older, DHS will record progress toward graduation or
efforts made to assist child toward graduation. This bill is tied
to additional caseworkers and additional requirements for permanency
hearings.
The administrators for the Children, Adults and Families Division of
DHS participated in the workgroup during the interim and assisted in
drafting all the bills.
Karen Nibler, Social Policy Coordinator
|
|
So,
What Happens Next Year?
Who will mind the store and how it will be done was the subject of a
fascinating meeting of the Senate Legislative Operations and Reform
Committee on May 2. Members of the committee had a conversation
with Senate Majority Leader Kate Brown and Senate Minority Leader Ted
Ferrioli about the management and goals of the Special 2008 legislative
session scheduled for February. It was the committee's final meeting
for 2007, and questions about how the first "annual session"
would go were numerous. The decision has already been made to
refer a constitutional amendment to voters in 2008 if the pilot project
proves successful.
Some objectives: Senate President Peter Courtney, a member of
the committee, referenced Senate Concurrent Resolution (SCR) 1, which created the deadlines of the current
session that will end June 29. He emphasized three elements which
he considers the core for the one month 2008 Assembly to do its work:
(1) all bills must be pre-session filed; (2) budget issues must be addressed;
and (3) current committees must be retained through the interim and
into the Special session.
Managing the work: Committee administrator Marjorie Taylor
distributed a packet of historical background information about numbers
of bills introduced in sessions since 1977, number heard, and number
actually passed. The average number of bills requested by a
Senate member is 30 and the average number by a Representative is
29. Some setting of priorities in bill drafting by Legislative
Counsel was suggested, and Senator Metzger recommended that interim
committees should have substance in the bills they proposed, that all
bills go through the committees with critical issues identified by the
Speaker and President of the Assembly.
Senator Brown addressed the problem of trying to limit bill
introduction for a short session as well as considering only the
introduction of emergency processed bills. Senator Ferrioli
agreed that pre-session filing would be helpful and perhaps managed
through the caucuses. There is the issue of confidentiality in
caucuses, but perhaps the leaders could share the legislative ideas
with each other for caucus consideration.
Some attention was paid to the management of regular legislative
sessions with the idea that if more of the large ticket items are ready
at the session's beginning, less time would be spent on managing
budgets and more time could be spent on the people's bills. This
led to comments about the time taken by state agency budgets, with the
suggestion that any agency with housekeeping legislation, should have
it readied during the interim, with access to research and legal advice
during the interim. The problems of Legislative Counsel during
this session - lateness in drafting bills, incorrect drafting, length of
time for amendments to come back - were considered as well as what
steps should be taken to remedy the problems.
It was obvious that not much attention has yet been paid to the goals
and management of the 2008 session, but the discussion has begun, and
from the interest expressed by members of the committee as well as by
Brown and Ferrioli, we can make an assumption that more serious plans
will be generated between now and when the interim begins in
July. There seemed to be agreement on keeping current committees
in place and having significant bills ready by October/November.
Kappy Eaton, Governance Coordinator
|
|
Election Law Reforms Require Patience
Oops!: A funny thing (not laughable) has
happened to SB 74. On May 2, the House Elections, Ethics
and Rules committee held a work session on SB 74 and adopted two
amendments, not seen until the meeting. These amendments would do
harm to the elections process: One removes the ability of election
office personnel to leave the office on Election Day to help a disabled
person outside with a ballot. The original bill removes all
polling places EXCEPT the county election offices, which remain as the
only polling place in each of the 36 Oregon counties. The amendments
apparently remove these offices, as well as prohibiting any person from
taking a ballot to another person, thus disenfranchising a disabled
person in a car outside. It appears that, in writing the amendments,
the protective statutes were eliminated.
The Elections Division and the Secretary of State are checking to see
what can be done about a bill that has passed out of a committee to the
House floor with a "do pass" recommendation with unacceptable
amendments. Stay tuned.
Double majority: HJR 14, the double majority revision requiring a
constitutional amendment, is on hold to see when the measure 37 bills
will be on the ballot. It appears it won't be until one of the
2008 elections.
Patience, patience (hmm)..
Kappy Eaton, Governance Coordinator
|
|
|
|
Also Waiting on Initiative Reform
We are still waiting for HB 2082A to be scheduled for hearing in Senate
Rules. It passed the House April 18. This is the bill which
tightens up regulations for paid petition passers, requires registration
with the Secretary of State (SOS), picture ID and training, provides
for payroll oversight by the Bureau of Labor and Industry, the Attorney
General and Secretary of State, allows electronic single signature
petitions, and requires 1000 signatures on the prescriptive petition in
order to receive a ballot title, among other provisions.
After the flurry of pent-up governance issues put into bill form, many
held in abeyance for almost 14 years, the current snail's pace to get
some of the bills moved is frustrating. Patience is not a virtue
in some of our vocabularies!
Kappy Eaton, Governance Coordinator
|
|
You
are receiving this email from League of Women Voters of Oregon because
you have subscribed or you are a League member. To ensure that you
continue to receive emails from us, add lwvor@lwvor.org to your address
book today. If you haven't done so already, click to confirm
your interest in receiving the Legislative Report from us.
|
|
|