From:                              League of Women Voters of Oregon [lwvor@lwvor.org]

Sent:                               Friday, June 08, 2007 12:49 PM

To:                                   lwvor@lwvor.org

Subject:                          LWV Legislative Report

 

LWV logo and Oregon Capitol

LEGISLATIVE REPORT

Published by the League of Women Voters® of Oregon

 

 

Subscribe to the Legislative Report

 

Follow Key Bills


The League's bill matrix, which lists key bills that we are following this session, is updated weekly.  The matrix includes legislative action taken, League action taken, and links to our testimony.

 

 

 

Volunteer


Help is needed to monitor legislative committees and report back to the Action Committee.  If you live close to Salem or have an Internet connection, you can learn to track bills and listen to hearings. Help is needed to monitor legislative committees and report back to the Action Committee.  It is a fascinating experience if you have time to dedicate to the legislative process.  Contact LWVOR to volunteer. 

 

LWVOR Action Committee

Chair:
Norman Turrill

Vice Chair:
Marge Easley

Citizen Access Coordinator:
Paula Krane

Governance Coordinator: Kappy Eaton

Natural Resources Coordinator:
Liz Frenkel

Social Policy Coordinator:
Karen Nibler

Legislative Coordinator:
Brena Lopez

Portfolio members and committee representatives:
Bob Adams
Debbie Aiona
Jane Baumgarten
Diana Bodtker
Anna Braun
Barbara Browning
Sarah Chaplen
Anita Francis
Barbara Fredericks
Norma Jean Germond
Gail Holmes
Peggy Lynch
Ellen Maddex
Janet Markee
Erin Miller
Margaret Noel
Barbara Ross
Nancy Stevens
Pam Vavra

Intern:
Terra Ashford

Legislative Report Editor:
Rebecca Smith

 

 

Campaign Finance Reform Commission

The League testified in favor of
HB 2060 on May 25 before the House Elections, Ethics and Rules Committee.  This bill would establish a Campaign Finance Reform Commission.  We agreed with proposed amendments to add additional legislators to the group along with citizens and to require a report before the February 2009 session.  The bill has not yet appeared again to consider the amendments.

Kappy Eaton, Governance Coordinator

 

 

Corporate Minimum Tax Hike Still Considered

Apparently the desire to increase the corporate minimum tax is still alive, and various proposals are being considered - but not in public.  Another meeting of the workgroup is scheduled for late afternoon today, June 8. Again, the problem of needing 36 votes in the House is in play in consideration of both the what and how of accomplishing the task.

Kappy Eaton, Governance Coordinator

 

 

Donate to the Legislative Report

Thank you to those of you who have generously contributed funds for the Legislative Report.  The Legislative Report costs money to produce, yet we don't want to limit who can receive it by charging a subscription fee.  Please support the volunteer Action Team's efforts to share the happenings at the Capitol with you and others.  You can send a donation, marked "Legislative Report" to the LWV address below. 

Thank you.

 

 

Elections Bills Add Homeless Voters; Petition Restrictions

The House has passed
HB 2762, which allows qualified voters who live in shelters, parks, motor homes, marinas or other identifiable locations to register to vote, and the bill has moved from Senate Rules to the Senate floor with a do pass recommendation. 

Also, HB 2640 A, which requires that nominating petitions contain the residence address or mailing address of persons signing petitions, has passed the House and moved out of the Senate Rules Committee.  We expect both to pass the Senate.

Kappy Eaton, Governance Coordinator

 

 

Double Majority Update


We had hoped the Senate Finance and Revenue Committee would move
HJR 14 A to the Senate floor at its hearing and work session on May 31.  However, this bill to revise the double majority may receive yet another amendment.  It was amended in the House to make elections every May and November not subject to the 50/50 restrictions.  One amendment was proposed to revert to the constitutional language, which would have required the whole constitutional section to be on the ballot, but it was not adopted.  It has not yet been scheduled for a final work session.  However, committees are now only required to give 24-hour notice of hearings, so who knows when!  We expect it to move forward and pass the Senate.

Kappy Eaton, Governance Coordinator

 

 

June 8, 2007

Welcome to issue 16 of the Legislative Report. This report will highlight issues around Healthy Kids, Measure 37, ethics, initiative reform, election laws, and tax expenditures.


Note: starting with the next issue, the Legislative Report will be arriving on Thursdays until the end of the session.

Sincerely,

Norman Turrill, Action Chair
Marge Easley, President

 

5 Minute Activist

5 MINUTE ACTIVIST

Healthy Kids bills SB 3 and SJR 4 were just passed to the Senate and House floors.

Call your legislators ask them to vote yes on these bills.  Let legislators know that health insurance coverage for children is a priority.  Preventive care of children will have a life-long benefit.  It's a good financial deal for Oregon with federal contributions.  

You can help: Contact your senators and representatives.

To find more information on this issue, read the article below.

 

Girl with paint on her handsHealthy Kids Proposals Need a Push

SB 31, the Senate's Healthy Kids bill, was heard in the Senate Health Policy Committee at the end of May and was sent to the Senate Health and Finance Committee along with SB 3 and SJR 4. SB 31 is the basic plan with private subsidies for those in the 200-350% of Federal Poverty Level (FPL).  SB 3 is a newly introduced, expanded bill capped at 300% of FPL.  SJR 4 proposes a constitutional amendment to impose additional taxes on tobacco products.  Senate Finance and Revenue took public testimony, including the League's, today, June 8, and passed SB 3 and SJR 4 to the House floor.

The vote on the bills was "Yes" from Senators Burdick, Deckert and Monroe and "No" from Senators George and Starr.  There was controversy about SJR 4 being a constitutional amendment.  Some preferred that the program be approved by the legislature rather than by amending the constitution. 

Although HB 2201 B, a version of the House's original Healthy Kids bill, failed on the House Floor along party lines in April, three other Healthy Kids bills were introduced in that chamber. On June 1, the House Revenue Committee heard HB 3558, which proposes low income children and pregnant women be covered with health insurance. It caps eligibility at 250% of FPL and includes an increase in the tobacco tax and a referral to voters. HB 3559 sets a special election for the tobacco tax for Oregon Healthy Kids and has been assigned to House Elections, Ethics and Rules Committee. HB 2967, which taxes tobacco products, was approved on June 1 in Ways and Means. It has no designated program for the revenue.

Children in families below the poverty level qualify for Medicaid, which matches the state expenditure of $.25 with $.75 federal funds: a bargain Oregon should be utilizing. The number of children below 200% of the poverty level is calculated to be 68,000, with another 15,500 under 250% of the poverty level. The Healthy Kids plan proposes to enroll eligible children without insurance. In HB 3558, pregnant women below the 250% FPL will also be eligible. A subsidy for children in families between 200 to 250% of the federal poverty level will assist the family in purchasing private insurance.

The Healthy Kids plan will utilize the existing Oregon Health Plan Medicaid eligible children and the Private Health Partnership Office to facilitate the purchase of private insurance; however, no new funds to implement the program were added to the agency budget at the time of its budget hearings. Under the plans, the Private Health Partnership will have the responsibility of marketing, training staff, and outreach to the uninsured. They will also approve health benefit plans for clients with the subsidy.

Republicans remain opposed to this program, because of decreasing revenues in the tobacco tax and the long term financial sustainability of the program.

Our senators and representatives need to hear from Oregonians that this issue is important to us.  Please see the 5 MINUTE ACTIVIST above to make a difference on this issue.

Karen Nibler, Social Policy Coordinator

 

Hammer about to break a piggy bankMeasure 37 Fix Goes to the Voters

This week the Senate and House both passed a bill which clarifies many of the issues surrounding Measure 37.  After months of public hearings and receiving testimony from over 300 Oregonians (as well as many emails and other communications), the Oregon Legislature has provided Oregonians with an opportunity to vote on HB 3540 C.  A separate bill will be needed to set the election date, but it is assumed to be November 6.  Until then, Measure 37 is in effect and claims processing will proceed.  If passed by the voters, the new legislation will take effect in December of 2007.  If current claimants die before this issue is resolved, heirs can step in to complete the claim process.

The legislation limits claims to residential uses and does not allow commercial or industrial claims like billboards, big box stores or aggregate mines.  However, residential claims for up to three houses (estimated to be about 40% of the current claims), if qualified, will be quick, easy and transferable.  And current claims which have been processed by both the state and local government and which can prove they are "vested" under common law can continue. 

Residential claims for four to ten houses (estimated to be about 30% of the current claims) must prove they lost that additional value by the application of land use laws.  As we are learning, due to the natural increase in land values, many claims may find it difficult to prove value lost at the level currently asked for by their claim applications.  Measure 37 referred to "compensation for loss."  By requiring appraisals for these larger claims, the waiver will more closely meet that compensation promise. 

Rules defining where Measure 37 development can occur have been created to protect, as best as possible, high value farm and forest land from development, while allowing claimants some recourse.  Other special areas, such as the lily fields near Harbor, OR, and our vibrant vineyards, were recognized.  Groundwater restricted areas will have special scrutiny. 

Ownership is clarified and spouses who were not added to a land deed on marriage are now assumed to be owners for Measure 37 claims.  Those who choose to go to court on Measure 37 issues can file in the local Circuit Court where the property is located.

Both sides of this issue can see positive sections and have concerns about others. HB 3540-C is a compromise bill.  The League of Women Voters supports HB 3540-C.  If you have questions, contact Liz Frenkel or Peggy Lynch through the LWVOR office

Liz Frenkel, Natural Resources Coordinator
Peggy Lynch, Action Committee Member

 

 

Getting Things Right


It's that time in the session - three weeks out - when certain nursery rhymes come to mind: "Here We Go Round the Mulberry Bush" (more amendments) and "Mary, Mary Quite Contrary" (keep it simple, get it done for heaven's sake); followed by the favorite symbol from "Alice in Wonderland" - Senate President Peter Courtney's alarm clock tie (a la the White Rabbit).  And what makes it all the more surreal is that there may be enough bi-partisan cooperation to fund the state police, through a dedicated beer tax, and healthy kids, through a rise in tobacco revenue.  These won't get passed outright, of course, but we will at least get an opportunity to vote on them.  The tobacco tax will probably be on the November 2007 ballot.   See the Healthy Kids article above for more information.

After 16 years of grid-lock and lip-service to compromise, the decision-makers appear to be getting a lot of things right for Oregonians.  So where are we with initiative reform, ethics law revisions, corporate minimum tax, legislative and judicial salaries/expenses, tax expenditures, election laws, campaign finance reform, more funding for victims of sexual abuse and domestic violence?  Keep reading to find out.

Kappy Eaton, Governance Coordinator

 

 

Details Slow Initiative Reform BillSignature

HB 2082 A, the comprehensive revision of the initiative process, is finally reaching fruition in the Senate Rules Committee.  Still intact are the stricter regulations for paid petitioners such as picture and signature ID, along with Secretary of State training, and review of the petition industry's payrolls, single-sheet, electronic, one-person signature sheets, and regulations on tampering with signature sheets.

Still on the table for discussion in the committee is a proposed amendment that 1000 signatures would be needed on the petition in order to obtain a ballot title, instead of the current 25 signatures.  A work session on the amendments will happen next week, perhaps Monday or Tuesday.  One of the amendments tampers with the signature provision, eliminating having a ballot title altogether. The League will oppose that amendment. 

We, and many other groups, are hoping for reasonable initiative reform this session and will continue to work hard for passage of HB 2082 A in its current wording.  Incidentally, Freedom Works is running radio ads urging Oregonians to protest changes "in our sacrosanct initiative process" and to contact their legislators to oppose any changes.  Bill numbers are not included in the ad.

Kappy Eaton, Governance Coordinator

 

 

Ethics Revisions Move to House Floor

The House Elections, Ethics and Rules Committee has been working on a revised version of
HB 2595 A, which addresses the administration of the Government Standards and Practices Commission (GSPC).  On June 4, the committee moved it to the House floor with a "do pass" recommendation, and the subsequent referral to Ways and Means was rescinded.  The House passed it unanimously June 7.

The Ways and Means Subcommittee on General Government has passed out HB 5025, which funds the operations of GSPC through the General Fund.  It is still sitting on SB 10 A, which funds the ability of GSPC to plan for an electronic filing system through fees on the entities it oversees, rather than by the General Fund, and puts in place restrictions on lobbying by former legislators and gift limits. Expected amendments will be discussed next week.  Testimony from legislators indicated their concern about the bill and the public perception of unethical conduct, but they still seem reluctant to move forward.  Crystal ball assumption: something will pass!

Kappy Eaton, Governance Coordinator

 

 

Mom, Dad and BabyWomen (and families)

With the successful passage of contraception, workplace milk expression and workplace leave for victims of domestic violence, several other bills on the Women's Health and Wellness agenda are moving forward.  The paid family leave fund,
HB 2575, is in Ways and Means because it requires a start-up loan until the revenue provided by employees can be collected.  We expect it to be approved, but not until all the major budgets have passed. 

SB 578, which addresses human trafficking, is in Ways and Means because it establishes a task force.  Also in Ways and Means is SB 873, which would provide birth defect monitoring.  The earned income tax credit bill, HB 2966, had a positive hearing in the House Revenue committee on May 30 and a work session to move on June 1.  This bill would exempt from payment of Oregon income taxes any income below the poverty level and impose a higher tax rate of 10% on incomes above $100,000 to make it revenue neutral.  Will it make it through the House?

Kappy Eaton, Governance Coordinator

 

 

 

Special Thanks


We would like to extend a special thanks to our intern, Terra Ashford, for her work on the Legislative Report.  Her time spent each week setting up the report was very valuable in getting our publication out on time and in a more professional manner.  Thank you!

Rebecca Smith, Editor and Members of the LWVOR Action Committee

 

 

Legislative and Judicial Salaries

SB 700 A, already passed by the Senate, had a positive hearing in House Elections, Ethics and Rules on June 4.  The League supports this bill, which would reactivate the Public Officials Compensation Commission.  It takes out of legislative hands the recommendations for salaries of all state-wide officials, the Legislature, and all judges.  The 11-member commission would be established immediately after the end of the current session and would prepare recommendations for the 2008 Special Session. 

The proposal would be sent to the Governor, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, President of the Senate and Speaker of the House by November 15, 2007, and would be acted upon by the February session.  The final proposal would go into effect July 1, 2008.  We are particularly pleased at the inclusion of the judicial officials, which we could support with the League's new advocacy position on Oregon State Courts.  The committee will hold a work session today, June 8.

Kappy Eaton, Governance Coordinator

 

 

Tax Expenditure Commission Considered

The League is supporting
SB 2001 A, which, as amended, would create a 14-member Tax Accountability Commission to review and audit state tax expenditures.  It would create criteria for reviewing expenditures and a review list and then make a report to the 2009 Legislature regarding its recommendations and findings.  The criteria to be used would include measuring the specific economic, employment and other outcomes by which the goals and purposes of the expenditures can be objectively evaluated. 

The League has proposed the addition of "public benefit" to the criteria.  American Association of University Women has proposed increasing the number of public members from 6 to 7 in order to make the membership an uneven number as well as specifically including "property tax expenditures" under "other tax expenditures."  Only personal and corporate income tax credits were named. These suggestions were to be considered at a subsequent hearing and work session. 

There would be a comprehensive list of measures for each expenditure under consideration by the Legislature.  A decision would be made to extend or repeal a particular expenditure, and there would be a regular schedule for review of those expenditures that have no repeal date.  We believe this is a positive move forward in this critical area of lost state revenue.

Kappy Eaton, Governance Coordinator