LWV logo and Oregon Capitol

LEGISLATIVE REPORT

Published by the League of Women Voters® of Oregon

 

 

Subscribe to the Legislative Report

 

Follow Key Bills


The League's bill matrix, which lists key bills that we are following this session, is updated weekly.  The matrix includes legislative action taken, League action taken, and links to our testimony.

 

 

LWVOR Action Committee

Chair:
Norman Turrill

Vice Chair:
Marge Easley

Citizen Access Coordinator:
Paula Krane

Governance Coordinator: Kappy Eaton

Natural Resources Coordinator:
Liz Frenkel

Social Policy Coordinator:
Karen Nibler

Legislative Coordinator:
Brena Lopez

Portfolio members and committee representatives:
Bob Adams
Debbie Aiona
Jane Baumgarten
Diana Bodtker
Anna Braun
Barbara Browning
Sarah Chaplen
Anita Francis
Barbara Fredericks
Norma Jean Germond
Gail Holmes
Peggy Lynch
Ellen Maddex
Janet Markee
Erin Miller
Margaret Noel
Barbara Ross
Nancy Stevens
Pam Vavra

Intern:
Terra Ashford

Legislative Report Editor:
Rebecca Smith

 

 

Looking Ahead

The legislative interim, although short this year, will involve a number of committee meetings. During the interim, legislators serve on committees and task forces that study issues likely to be faced during the next legislative session. Dates have not yet been set, but committee staff anticipate schedules to be released perhaps even as early as this month.  Committee schedules will be available on line at
http://www.leg.state.

or.us/comm/
. Email notification is expected to be available as well.  Sign up for email notification of committee meetings on the Legislature's home page by clicking on where it says "Esubscribe" on the right side and follow the prompts.

The scheduled remodeling of the Capitol wings is not expected to affect committee meeting locations, according to committee staff.

This year, the interim will be short because legislators have scheduled a special session for 2008.  This session will last less than a month, so agendas will be limited to the most pressing fiscal and policy issues. Topics expected to be discussed are land use (depending on what the voters decide on the M37 fix), paid family leave, limits of government liability, drug-free workplaces, an emergency wireless network, and aid for timber dependent counties after Congress granted only a one-year extension of federal payments. Other potential topics are adjustments to the new ethics laws passed in SB 10 and HB 2595, campaign finance reform, and redistricting reform.

Important dates
Nov. 15, 2007: Deadline for Senate requests for bill drafting
Jan. 18, 2008: Deadline for pre-session filing of Senate measures
Feb. 4: Session opens
Feb. 29: Session adjourns

The House has not yet set specific dates, but will probably do so through its interim committees.

Rebecca Smith, Editor

 

July 5, 2007

Welcome to issue 20 of the Legislative Report. This is our last issue until August.  In mid-August, after the Governor has signed or vetoed the final bills, we will send the Sine Die report. Please watch for this report in your in box.

Link here to our printer-friendly version.

Sincerely,

Norman Turrill, Action Chair
Marge Easley, President

 

 

Thanks for Responding to Alerts!
Group of people applauding
The Action Team appreciates the time you took to respond to the 5 Minute Activist alerts.  During this session, it was clear that you made your voices heard with your own legislators and those who were the decision makers on many efforts.  It was especially evident during our work on amending Measure 37.  Thank you!

It was apparent that you read the Legislative Report during the session and pursued your own particular interests as we reported on them.  There was increased funding for our state parks, both acquisition and maintenance, as well as more money for local parks partners.  Oregon State Water Resources Department received more money to study our water sources.  We look forward to the results of the newly adopted League study on
Water Resources of Oregon, which will help guide the League's future efforts on this critical issue. 

The League studies on the judiciary and on homeless youth helped in elevating both issues at the Legislature.  Members of the Judicial Department received a well-deserved salary increase.  Affordable housing (which our study showed was critical to the success of keeping kids at home) became a priority of legislative leadership.  Although we were unsuccessful this term in getting a document recording fee to help support housing, there was increased funding placed in the Housing Trust Fund. 

Know that your voice counts as you attend local town halls and share your concerns, as you contact your legislators at the Capitol and as you support Action by responding to 5 Minute Activist alerts and information in the Legislative Report.

Peggy Lynch, Action Committee Member

 

 Construction Projects, Budget Adjustments, and the Big Look

All during this session, various groups have asked for a variety of construction projects, but the Ways and Means Co-chairs wanted to be sure that the state's bonding limit wasn't exceeded.  They gathered all the requests, considered their merits, listened to fellow legislators, acknowledged the increase in lottery revenues, which are often used to back state bonds, and came out with HB 5005 and 5006.  Link to these bills to learn which projects are being funded.
 
Also at the end of session were two "Christmas tree" bills which allocated monies for a variety of projects:  SB 994 and SB 5549.  This year there was also an ending bill related to education projects:  HB 3141.  Although the bulk of monies were allocated during the regular Ways and Means process where individual agency budgets were heard, these bills include important adjustments to the state's budget.  We encourage you to read them. 

The League continues to be concerned that this process sometimes mixes policy decisions with budgeting, but, on the whole, we were pleased with the content of these bills.  Many of the additions, such as more money to fund groundwater studies, were part of the League's testimony earlier in the session.

Among the funding adjustments was a reduction in funding for the Big Look Task Force.  From the League's point of view, the task force, whose mission was to review Oregon's land use system and discuss changes with Oregonians, seemed to be going in the wrong direction.  The League supported this mission (SB 82, 2005) and has had monitors at almost every task force meeting.  However, the task force chose not to factually review our current system and had started developing a public outreach program seemingly more designed for land use "wonks" than for the average Oregonian. 

Toward the end of session, the League wrote a letter to those who had appointed the task force members - the Governor and legislative leadership - suggesting that the Big Look Task Force's efforts 1) would be clouded by the public discussion on amending Measure 37 to be held this summer and fall and 2) seemed to be going in the wrong direction.  We suggested that the task force be put on hold until 2009.  Although that action was not taken, we were pleased that the Co-chairs chose to reduce funding for the Big Look and are hopeful that the task force will get back on track related to the original purposes as listed under SB 82. 

The League will continue to monitor and work with the task force to assure that all Oregonians better understand the importance of our statewide land use system to our everyday lives and offer opportunities for Oregonians to suggest changes to strengthen our system.   
 
Peggy Lynch, Action Committee Member

 

 

images of the judiciaryGovernor Signs Most OJD Bills


Each session, like all state departments, the
Oregon Judicial Department (OJD) prepared bills for pre-session filing. This early filing allows the departments to express up front what is important to them, and also means these bills are heard early on in the session. Because of the League's recent study on the Oregon Judiciary (see report), we have been closely monitoring the bills submitted by the Oregon Judicial Department. 

This year OJD filed SB 267A, relating to local courts as courts of record.  The bill stipulates that county justice courts and municipal courts must file a petition with the Supreme Court to request an order of approval of operation as a court of record.  The county or city will provide a court reporter or an audio recording device.  Requests must be made by March 1, 2008.  For more details, link to the bill.

SB 269 requires the State Trial Court Administrator (TCA) to specify forms to be used in domestic relations actions, such as temporary restraining orders or changes in custody or parenting time with a child.  These forms should assist pro se clients to fill out these forms without the assistance of an attorney.

SB 270 requires that the court hire a qualified interpreter or person operating an assistive communication device for a juror with a hearing or speech disability.  The interpreter shall be present during jury deliberations but may not participate except to facilitate communication between the juror with the disability and other jurors.

SB 271B gives a judge the authority to waive or defer all or part of the fees and court costs in a civil action, or a judge may delegate the authority to the TCA for the court.  The Chief Justice may provide standards and practices for waiver or deferral under this act.  For more details, link to the bill.

SB 292A, initiated by the Senate Judiciary Committee, specifies that any party in a circuit court proceeding may arrange for reporting by stenographic means and the reporting may be used as the official record of the proceedings for an appeal.  For all other purposes, the record shall be the reporting technique used by the court. 

HB 2322A is a housekeeping bill for the OJD concerning search warrants, appeals of criminal judgments, and rules for the practice of law by judges.  Section 4 stipulates that a judicial officer appointed or elected to a full-time position may not act as an attorney in an action or proceeding.  Exceptions are if the judicial officer is a party to the action or has a direct interest in the action.  A county court or justice court judge may act as an attorney in a court other than the court in which he or she presides, but may not be in practice with an attorney who appears in the court in which he or she presides.  A judge pro tempore may not preside in an action if an attorney in his practice appears in a proceeding.

HB 2357A was initiated by the Oregon State Bar and relates to the use of electronic documents, electronic images of documents and use of electronic transmission for process of documents.  The State Court Administrator may establish procedures for destruction of records after making a photographic film or electronic image of each document.  The documents must be retained for the required period. 

SB 273A allows the State Court Administrator to authorize access to electronic files with the provision to preserve the confidentiality of the records. 

SB 268 concerns appellate court judicial review of Worker's Compensation Board orders.  It allows the Court of Appeals to dismiss petitions for review if a settlement disposes of all issues, or limit the review to issues not disposed of by settlement. 

HB 2368 provides that after filing a notice of appeal, the trial court retains jurisdiction for the purpose of deciding motions for judgment, a new trial, or relief from judgment.

HB 2318 relates to mediation in tax court and stipulates that if the mediation does not result in an agreed settlement within 60 days after the end of the mediation session, the appeal shall be assigned to a magistrate for hearing. 

HB 2343 relates to the process for juvenile court judgment appeals by court-appointed counsel.

Karen Nibler, Social Policy Chair