Note:  Education reports after January, 2024, are included in Social policy reports. Education reports prior to February, 2024, can be found HERE.

Please see the Legislation Tracker for 2025 Social Policy bills.

Jump to topic:

• Age-Related Issues

• Behavioral Health

• Education

• Gun Policy

• Healthcare

• Housing Legislation

• Immigration

Age-Related Issues

by Trish Garner

SB 548, a bill that sets age 18 as the minimum age for marriage, was unanimously passed by the House Judiciary Committee and now heads to the House for a vote. It has already been passed in the Senate. The League submitted testimony in support.

HB 3187A, the workplace age discrimination bill, has passed the House and Senate and is heading to the Governor’s office for signature. The bill prohibits employers from asking for a date of birth or graduation date on job applications unless it is a job requirement or an offer of employment has already been made. LWVOR submitted testimony in support.

Behavioral Health

By Trish Garner

HB 3835-A5 - A Public Hearing was held in the House Committee on Rules regarding this bill which is long (107 pages) and has undergone significant changes since first introduced. It currently attempts to address problems in providing care to children needing residential behavioral health treatment that have arisen as a result of prior legislation passed in 2021 (SB 719). The Chief Sponsors of SB 219 included Senators Sarah Gelser-Blouin and James Manning, Jr. When initially filed, HB 3835 also related to school settings, but those provisions have been removed.

HB 3835 arose from recommendations made by the legislatively mandated (2019) System of Care Advisory Council which is comprised of numerous stakeholders, including providers, agencies, youth, families, experts and others (See, SOCAC Bylaws, description). Among other duties, SOCAC is charged with developing a long-term plan for Oregon’s behavioral health care. settings, including out-of-state placements of children.  It notes that between 2021 and 2024 Oregon has seen a 41% reduction (from 90 to 53 facilities) in licensed residential facilities that can serve children and youth with behavioral or psychiatric treatment. Oregon has also lost more than half (from 31 to 14) of its programs that certify foster parents who provide specialized behavioral health treatment and support  (SOCAC testimony).

In sum, HB 3835 clarifies that trained staff at residential treatment facilities can intervene, restrain or seclude youth only if the behavior poses a reasonable risk of imminent “serious physical harm” to the child or others, including staff. The current standard is more restrictive and requires establishing whether the behavior is at a level to cause “severe bodily injury” before an intervention can take place. There are numerous provisions that relate to how and when abuse complaints can be brought against staff which can result in loss of a provider’s license. In addition, the bill allows for but adds rules for out-of-state residential treatment placement. These rules, for example, require a court to approve the placement, out-of-state providers must meet Oregon standards, representatives from ODHS and OHA must personally visit and approve the facilities, youth must be advised of their rights, and an in-person visit by ODHS must take place every 15 days while a child is in care. HB 3835 also establishes rules regarding licensed secure transport providers.

Proponents of HB 3835 state that the current rules regarding the use of restraint and seclusion in residential child-care settings are so overbroad that any intervention to prevent suicide or assault must be reported and investigated as child abuse. These rules include, for example, that a child must be provided water and an opportunity to use the bathroom every 5 minutes. If a complaint is justified, even for minor violation of these rules, providers may be found to have committed child abuse and so lose their license. The duty to report all incidents to ODHS and OHA is burdensome to treatment facilities. Providers cannot work during the investigation period. As a result of this system, staff are unwilling to work in these settings lest they lose their licenses. Because of the current law many residential treatment centers no longer do business in Oregon, which in turn has resulted in too many of Oregon’s at-risk children waiting in emergency departments or  hotels waiting to get the care they need.

The Chief Sponsors of HB 3835 include Representatives Rob Nosse and Ed Diehl. Others in favor of passage include Oregon Division of Health Services: Child Division, Oregon Health Authority, Oregon Education Association, Trillium Family Services, Oregon Psychiatric Physicians Association, the Oregon Council of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, NAMI and others.

Governor Kotek testified in strong support of this bill. She stated that it clarifies Oregon’s regulatory framework for child caring agencies, ensures safeguards, and guarantees access to care even across state lines when necessary.  She stated that Oregon should work for a regulatory environment that protects children by preventing abuse in care while also providing clear guidance for people doing the care so they can do their jobs.

Those opposed state that the bill would eliminate much needed protections for youth in care and place them at further risk. If enforcement through possible license termination is severely restricted or eliminated, compliance with rules regarding restraint and seclusion will be largely ignored. Regulations about in-person facility approval and visits while youth are in these facilities can also be delegated. The leading opponent of the bill is Senator Gelser-Blouin who also filed SB 1113 in this legislative Session. A Work Session in the Senate Committee on Human Services was held on that bill on April 3rd but under legislative rules the bill is no longer viable in this Session. Disability Rights Oregon, Our Children Oregon, parents and children also oppose HB 3835.

If approved by the House Rules Committee, HB 3835 would be sent to Ways & Means for further consideration.

Education

By Jean Pierce

Once again, the work session when the House Education committee would consider SB 1098 , the Freedom to Read bill, was postponed. Now it is scheduled for May 19.  LWVOR provided testimony  in support.

HB 2586A has made it to the floor of the Senate. The bill would permit an asylum seeker who is a student at a public university to receive an exemption from nonresident tuition and fees. LWVOR filed testimony in support. Third reading was scheduled for May 15, but it has been carried over to May 19. 

Now that LWVOR has approved K-12 education positions for Assessment, Attracting and Retaining Well-Qualified Teachers, and Not Using Public Funds for Private Schools, we can report on the progress of the following bills. Our new positions permit us to support the first two and oppose the third. 

SB 141 directs school districts to administer and review interim assessments in math and language arts to measure student academic growth – in Ways and Means

HB 3200A Would require that a specific amount from the Fund for Student Success be allocated to the scholarship program for diverse teacher candidates – in Ways and Means.

SJR 24 Would amend the constitution to establish “School Choice Accounts for non-public education – in Senate Rules since January.

How Federal Actions are Affecting Education in Oregon

Pell Grants

Congress is currently deliberating a budget reconciliation bill that cuts $330 billion from the budget. If passed into law, the bill would make it harder for students with financial need to attend college by cutting financial aid in the following ways: 

• Restricting Pell Grant eligibility, eliminating interest subsidies, and ending graduate PLUS loans 

• Reducing protections against predatory schools, capping lifetime borrowing, and linking loan limits to the median cost of programs 

Currently, 77,275 Oregonians are receiving an average of $4,644 in Pell Grant funding. The Proposed changes could mean nearly two out of three recipients could lose some or all their federal grant aid and incur up to an additional cost of $7,400 for a bachelor’s degree and $3,700 for an associate degree.

National School Voucher Program

The budget reconciliation bill also contains a national school voucher program. On May 14 the US House Ways and Means Committee passed an amendment to the budget package which includes a $20 billion voucher program—$5 billion per year for four years. (See p. 57-71.)

More details on the current version of this voucher bill are here: "Dangerous National Private School Voucher Program Included in House Budget Legislation." It is smaller than previously proposed, and it has weak provisions  requiring private schools to follow students' Individualized Education Programs.

Like all voucher programs, this one would mostly subsidize families that already send their children to private schools, and, because the income limits are set so high, even families making more than $300K will be able to receive vouchers, with no limits on the size of the voucher.

Moreover, because it is structured as a tax-credit scholarship program, it would also be a tax shelter for the wealthy, one that drastically changes the incentives for all charitable donations, by increasing the incentives for taxpayers to contribute to voucher-granting organizations instead of any other cause.

Although the budget reconciliation bill was blocked this week by Republicans who do not believe it goes far enough in making cuts, it is expected to pass the House and the Senate, which is prohibited from filibustering that type of bill. 

Gun Policy

By Marge Easley

SB 243 A with the -9 amendment was heard in Senate Rules on May 12. The amended version still contains a ban on rapid fire devices and an expansion of the number of public areas where guns may be prohibited, but unfortunately much has been stripped from the original bill. This is largely because of fiscal impacts that would most likely endanger its passage, given the current budget crisis. No longer in the bill is an age restriction of 21 for gun ownership, a 72-hour wait period before the transfer of a firearm, and the ability of cities and counties to ban firearms in the adjacent grounds of certain public areas. The amended bill passed out of Senate Rules on May 14 on a party line vote of 3 to 2 and is now on the way to the Senate floor. 

The fate of several gun bills (SB 1015, HB 3075 A, and HB 3076 A) that now sit in Ways and Means is still unknown, but the League concurs with other gun safety supporters on this important point: “The first and strongest argument when it comes to funding should always be that fewer deaths and injuries will save the public an average of $500,000 to $2 million per injury/death, which is much higher than the total funds for all of these bills combined.” (Based on calculations from Everytown for Gun Safety) 

Healthcare

By Christa Danielson

SB 951A would stop Management Service Organizations from making patient care decisions. This will allow the medical professionals to decide what will be the best course of treatment for the patient. This bill received a Do Pass recommendation this week from the House Committee on  Behavioral Health and Health Care.

Housing

By Nancy Donovan and Debbie Aiona

Steady progress has been made in addressing our state’s housing crisis by investing in affordable housing production and preservation. Now thousands of Oregonians have housing stability with affordable homes. Housing advocates are being encouraged to take action now by sending messages to members of the Oregon Legislature's Joint Subcommittee on Capital Construction, and top housing leaders in both the House and Senate, to invest in bond resources in the 2025-2027 state budget. 

Bills Passed by the House and Senate

SB 814 A will be administered by Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to expand eligibility criteria for the agency’s existing Long-Term Rent Assistance Program. Oregon Youth Authority (OYA) youth under the age of 25 would have an opportunity to access long-term rental assistance to help achieve a greater level of housing security. This measure also requires OHCS to consult with the Oregon Youth Authority (OYA), among other stakeholders. Youth assisted will be exiting a childcare center or a correctional facility. At least 14% of youth who were committed to OYA since October 2022 have already experienced some period of homelessness. Studies indicate that housing instability increases the risk for recidivism. This bill will assist youth by providing a safe and stable home so they can devote their attention to employment, education, and family. This bill passed the Senate and House on May 14. The League submitted testimony in support.

SB 973 protects residents of publicly-supported housing by requiring notices from landlords when affordability restrictions are ending. This applies to tenants who are living in subsidized units, applicants, and new tenants. For existing tenants, the bill would extend the notice requirements from 20 to 30 months. It will require landlords to warn tenants that their housing will no longer be affordable. For applicants and new tenants who are entering into a new rental agreement, landlords of publicly-supported housing must provide written notice of when the affordability period will end, prior to charging a screening fee or entering into a new rental application. These tenant protections are critical to giving low-income Oregonians additional time to find stable housing they can afford. The Senate and House passed this bill on May 14. The League submitted testimony in support.

Bills in Progress 

SB 5531 authorizes lottery bond revenue for affordable housing preservation, and infrastructure to support new housing production. There is widespread recognition of Oregon’s housing shortage, particularly for very low-income households. Thirty-six affordable housing properties in Oregon face foreclosure in the next two years. An additional 76 properties are operating at a monthly deficit due to unsustainable operating costs. Losing these homes will force even more Oregonians into homelessness or housing instability. Preservation is a cost-effective and efficient approach to address our housing crisis. Allocating $160 million for preservation of rental housing and $25 million to preserve manufactured housing parks is a sound investment. In addition, the $100 million Housing Infrastructure Fund will address one of the barriers to housing production—the lack of infrastructure needed to support development. This allocation is consistent with HB 3031 (also supported by LWVOR) that, if passed, would provide financial assistance through the Housing Infrastructure Fund for municipal infrastructure including transportation, water, wastewater, and stormwater facilities. The financial assistance program will result in affordable housing for families and individuals with very low, low, or moderate incomes. The Senate held a public hearing on May 9, and an informational hearing will be held on May 16. The League submitted testimony in support.

HB 3054 would limit rent increases for homeowners in manufactured home parks and marinas and curtail other landlord practices that can threaten residents’ ability to stay in their homes. The bill passed the House and is scheduled for a work session on May 19 in the Senate Committee on Housing and Development. LWVOR submitted a letter in support.

Did Not Pass

HB 2735 would have raised the cap on the tax credit that funds the Individual Development Accounts program from $7.5 million/year to $16.5 million/year. The state matches participants’ savings up to 5–to-1 giving them the opportunity to put aside money for college, homeownership, or starting a business, among other things. The League submitted testimony supporting this bill. The House Revenue Committee held an informational meeting, but it did not advance to the Senate. 

Immigration

By Becky Gladstone and Claudia Keith

Highlights - News 

• America closed: The refugee crisis at our front door - OPB: KLCC

• Trump administration brings 59 white South Africans to U.S., says they’re persecuted refugees - Oregonlive.com

• 20 state AGs sue feds for tying transportation and disaster funding to immigration enforcement • Oregon Capital Chronicle 

• Legislative Bulletin — Friday, May 16, 2025 - National Immigration Forum

Oregon Legislature - BiPoc Press Releases

Find below links to Oregon Legislature Bipoc caucus 2025 press releases. Many of the members are first or second generation immigrants. 

Click Scroll Bar on Bottom of Table to View All Columns

Interested in reading additional reports? Please see our Climate Emergency, Governance, and Natural Resources, and Revenue report sections.